For Immediate Release: Contact:
July 22, 2008 Matt Elliott: 609-392-5151
Report Makes Case For Best Alternatives to Oil
Calls
for Dramatic Increase in Plug-in Hybrid Technology;
Paints
Grim Picture for Corn Ethanol
Many
alternative fuels designed to wean
America off of oil will cause a whole host of other problems and increase
global warming emissions, according to a report released today by Environment
New Jersey. The report cites liquid
coal, corn ethanol and soy biodiesel as the worst examples; all of which have
50% - 100% greater relative emissions than conventional gasoline. The report shows that the best solution to
lowering emissions from vehicles is to combine the approaches that offer the
greatest environmental benefits. For example, an efficient plug-in hybrid
vehicle operating on electricity and cellulosic ethanol made from crop waste has
emissions that are at least 70% lower than gasoline.
“Today’s headlines
are telling us that we must move away from oil as a transportation fuel,” said
Matt Elliott of Environment New Jersey.
“We cannot afford to make other problems worse in our quest to reduce our
dependence on oil.”
The report; Beyond
Oil: The Transportation Fuels That Can Help Reduce Global Warming,
evaluates the leading contenders in the alternative fuels race, with a specific
focus on their impact on global warming and the environment. Key findings include:
- Liquid Coal Fuel - Liquid produced from coal creates at least 80
percent more global warming pollution than gasoline. The fuel starts with a high-carbon
energy source and requires heavy processing.
- Corn Ethanol - High-volume
corn ethanol production does not result in lower global warming emissions
than gasoline. In fact, full life-cycle emissions from corn ethanol may be
twice as high as gasoline, when secondary land-use impacts are taken into
account. The increased production
of corn ethanol has also caused a host of other problems including
competition for cropland used for food and water pollution.
- Biodiesel - Biodiesel from soybeans,
the most common feedstock for biodiesel, is at least 50 percent more
polluting than conventional diesel and, like corn ethanol, can cause many
other problems associated with high intensity agriculture. The report also found that life-cycle
global warming pollution emissions from biodiesel can be as much as 98
percent less than conventional diesel, if the diesel is made from
waste cooking oil.
- Natural gas - Natural gas reduces air pollution and global
warming pollution compared with gasoline vehicles. But natural gas fueling
infrastructure is expensive and domestic supplies of natural gas are both
finite and increasingly constrained.
- Hydrogen - Hydrogen has long been touted as the transportation fuel of the
future. But the environmental impacts of hydrogen depend greatly on how it
is produced, and hydrogen-powered vehicles are still a long way from being
available to American consumers.
- Plug-in hybrids and all-electric vehicles -
Because electric motors are far more efficient than internal combustion
engines, vehicles that use electricity almost always produce less global
warming pollution than gasoline vehicles, even when the electricity used
to fuel them is generated from coal. Plug in hybrids powered by the average
U.S. electricity mix are 50% less polluting than gasoline. The benefits are far greater when
vehicles are fueled with renewably-generated electricity.
- Cellulosic Ethanol - Producing cellulosic ethanol from certain
feedstocks can reduce global warming pollution. Cellulosic ethanol made
from crop waste or prairie grass grown on abandoned or marginal cropland
can have emissions well below that of gasoline.
“As the race for
alternative fuels accelerates, we must encourage the development of new options
that reduce global warming and avoid severe environmental impacts,” said Elliott.
“We need to put the brakes on the rush to corn ethanol and liquid coal and move
toward clean 21st century solutions like plug-in hybrids and cleaner
fuels.”
The report makes a number of recommendations to
local, state and federal policymakers for achieving large reductions in global
warming pollution from cars and light trucks and reducing our oil dependence;
including:
·
Adopting requirements to
lower the carbon content of transportation fuels; including amending the
recently passed federal renewable fuels standard to require that all ethanol
sold be subject to a low carbon fuel standard.
·
Rejecting policies that promote
or subsidize fuels that would make the problem worse.
·
Requiring that by 2020,
all new vehicles are capable of using lower carbon fuels, whether electricity
or bio-fuels.
·
Supporting additional research
into cultivation techniques for cellulosic feedstock and into technologies for
converting cellulosic feed-stocks, especially waste, into fuel.
·
Improving vehicle fuel
economy and pursuing measures to reduce total driving. These measures would
further cut global warming emissions and reduce our vulnerability to rapid
changes in the global petroleum market.
“As
Governor Corzine develops plans to slash New Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions
by 80%, he should take bold steps to clean up our state’s transportation,” said
Elliott. “By committing to an approach
that combines the best technologies and the cleanest fuels, New Jersey can lead
the country in improving energy security and cutting global warming pollution.” said Elliott. “One thing is clear: America has little time
to lose in addressing these challenges.
And we cannot afford false starts.”
Environment New Jersey is a non-profit environmental
organization representing over 20,000 citizen members.